SimonMed Employees Claim Unpaid Overtime Wages
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Ader et al v. SimonMed Imaging Incorporated et al
Filed: June 29, 2017 ◆§ 2:17-cv-02085-JJT
Two Arizona consumers have filed a proposed collective action against SimonMed Imaging Incorporated claiming the company denied them required overtime wages by misclassifying them as exempt employees.
Two Arizona consumers have filed a proposed collective action against SimonMed Imaging Incorporated claiming the company denied them required overtime wages by misclassifying them as exempt employees. According to the suit, the plaintiffs worked for the defendant as a modality service engineer and an MRI field engineer, performing mostly manual labor. The complaint argues that they both worked more than 40 hours per week and should have qualified for time-and-a-half overtime wages for the hours they worked above 40 each week. They say the defendant unlawfully claimed they were exempt from overtime requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act and denied paying them any overtime wages.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.