Senator Construction Sued by Two Former Workers Over Allegedly Unpaid Overtime
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Cepeda et al. v. Senator Construction Group Inc. et al.
Filed: February 18, 2018 ◆§ 1:18-cv-01045
Two plaintiffs have put their names on a proposed collective action in which they claim Senator Construction Group Inc. and its owner failed to pay proper overtime wages and comply with federal record-keeping requirements.
Two plaintiffs have put their names on a proposed collective action in which they claim Senator Construction Group Inc. and its owner failed to pay proper overtime wages and comply with federal record-keeping requirements. One plaintiff, who the case says worked for the defendants from February to July 2016 and later from June through October 2017, claims he typically put in 60 hours per week for the defendants without time-and-a-half overtime pay. The complaint further alleges that the man’s wages were often delayed, and that checks would sometimes bounce due to insufficient funds. The second plaintiff, who handled general construction duties similar to those of the first plaintiff from July through October 2017, also claims he worked 60 hours per week without rightful overtime wages. Both men allege they were not provided with mandatory wage notices at the time they were hired, nor with wage statements detailing their pay rates and hours worked.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.