Rooms to Go Facing Lawsuit Over Use of ‘Fluctuating Workweek’ Pay Method
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Arevalo v. RTG Furniture Corporation, et al.
Filed: October 11, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-04035-ELR
Rooms to Go and its subsidiary furniture companies are facing a lawsuit that claims their use of the 'fluctuating workweek' pay model led to unpaid OT.
RTG Furniture Corporation RTG Furniture Corporation of Georgia RTG Furniture Corporation of Texas Rooms to Go Louisiana Corporation Rooms to Go Mississippi Corporation Rooms to Go Alabama Corporation Rooms to Go North Carolina Corporation Rooms to Go Tennessee Corporation
Georgia
A proposed class action out of Georgia claims RTG Furniture Corporation and its Rooms to Go subsidiaries across seven states have failed to pay appropriate overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The plaintiff, who the case says is currently employed by the defendants as a distribution center supervisor, alleges that prior to January 1, 2017, Rooms to Go paid him (and other supervisors) under the “fluctuating workweek” method, through which he was supposed to receive a set pay rate each week regardless of how many hours he worked, plus half of his regular hourly rate for all hours worked over 40. The plaintiff argues the defendants violated the FLSA by paying him only half-time for his over-40 hours worked, and not proper time-and-a-half hourly overtime.
The case claims that although supervisors should have been guaranteed the same wages each week under Rooms to Go’s fluctuating workweek pay model regardless of how many hours they worked, proposed class members’ wages varied as a result of the distribution of shift bonuses (for working night shifts) and survey bonuses for positive customer reviews.
“Because of Rooms to Go’s payment of shift and survey bonuses, [the plaintiff] was not guaranteed the same rate of pay regardless of the number of hours he worked,” the case argues. “Instead, under Rooms to Go’s compensation policy, his weekly pay fluctuated depending on whether he worked the night shift during a given week and whether he received a survey bonus.”
Because of these extra bonuses, the case claims, the company’s fluctuating workweek pay practices were invalid, and therefore, plaintiffs and proposed class members should have received overtime pay when working more than 40 hours a week.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.