NYC Italian Restaurant Adoro Lei, Owners Named in Wage and Hour Complaint
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Diaz Oropeza et al v. Adoro Lei, Llc et al
Filed: February 8, 2018 ◆§ 1:18cv1141
A former pizza maker claims Adoro Lei and its owners failed to pay proper overtime and did not provide him with meal or rest breaks of any kind.
Adoro Lei and four individuals with control over the business face a proposed collective action in which the plaintiff claims the New York City Italian eatery failed to pay proper wages. The plaintiff, a former pizza maker, claims he typically worked 59 hours per week between September 2016 and May 2017, and 52 hours per week until the end of his employment in January 2018 without time-and-a-half pay or spread-of-hours premiums for shifts that lasted longer than 10 hours. Moreover, the plaintiff says he was never provided with meal or rest breaks of any kind, nor wage statements detailing his wages and hours worked. Lastly, the case alleges the plaintiff was never reimbursed by the defendants for purchasing his own “tools of the trade,” including six work shirts and kitchen shoes.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.