Lawsuit: Sunlight Supply Failed to Provide Notice of Mass Layoff from Vancouver, WA Facilities
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Martin v. Sunlight Supply, Inc.
Filed: April 24, 2018 ◆§ 2:18cv600
Sunlight Supply, Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit alleging the company failed to provide workers 60 days’ notice of a mass layoff in accordance with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.
Sunlight Supply, Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit alleging the company failed to provide workers 60 days’ notice of a mass layoff in accordance with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act.
The plaintiff alleges that beginning on November 16, 2017, the defendant began a mass layoff of approximately 200 employees from its Vancouver, Washington facilities. The case argues that under the WARN Act, the defendant was required to provide employees with appropriate notice of the layoff at least 60 days prior but failed to do so. As a result, the lawsuit claims, employees are owed 60 days’ worth of wages and benefits, including salary, commissions, bonuses, holiday pay, accrued vacation days, and 401(k) contributions.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.