Lawsuit Says Daniel Defense Must Pay After Executing Mass Layoff Without Warning
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Cryer v. Daniel Defense, Inc.
Filed: October 19, 2017 ◆§ 4:17-cv-00197-WTM-GRS
Daniel Defense, Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action that claims it executed a mass layoff without warning, in violation of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988.
Daniel Defense, Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action that claims it executed a mass layoff without warning, in violation of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (WARN Act). According to the suit, the defendant ran two facilities in Georgia from which it terminated a total of approximately 160 employees between September 29, 2017 and October 2, 2017, including the plaintiff. The complaint argues that under federal law, the defendant was required to provide 60 days’ notice of the mass layoff and failed to do so. The suit is seeking 60 days’ worth of wages, vacation pay, 401(k) contributions, payment of medical expenses, and any other employee benefits of which the laid-off employees were allegedly deprived.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.