Lawsuit Filed Against Snooze Restaurant for Allegedly Unpaid Wages
by Nadia Abbas
Last Updated on July 24, 2018
Amador-Stewart v. Snooze Hic, Llc et al
Filed: July 16, 2018 ◆§ 3:18cv1604
Snooze HIC LLC is facing a proposed collective and class action accusing the defendant of labor law violations.
Snooze HIC LLC is facing a proposed collective and class action accusing the defendant of labor law violations. The plaintiff, a former server at a California restaurant owned by the defendant, alleges she was deprived of lawful minimum and overtime wages. The lawsuit claims the defendant had a “consistent policy” of requiring servers to work over 40 hours per week without lawful time-and-a-half compensation and didn’t pay them at least the full minimum hourly wage for all hours worked.
The lawsuit further alleges that the defendant regularly failed to pay employees all earned wages after termination or resignation. California law requires that employers pay discharged employees all owed wages immediately or within 72 hours of resignation, the lawsuit says.
The lawsuit seeks to cover two proposed classes: servers employed by any of the defendant’s United States restaurants on or after July 9, 2015, and servers employed by any of the defendant’s California restaurants on or after July 9, 2014.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.