Lawsuit: Construction Company Deprives Workers of Travel Time Pay
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Hatcher v. Frank A Rogers & Co Inc et al
Filed: July 27, 2017 ◆§ 3:17-cv-00190-DPM
Frank A. Rogers & Co., Inc. and one individual with control over the business are defendants in a proposed collective action that claims they failed to compensate employees for time spent traveling to and from job sites.
Frank A. Rogers & Co., Inc. and one individual with control over the business are defendants in a proposed collective action that claims they failed to compensate employees for time spent traveling to and from job sites. The plaintiff – who was employed as a construction worker – says he and similarly situated employees were required to report to the defendants’ office yard at the start of each day to load tools into company vehicles and then travel to job sites. At the end of each shift, the plaintiff continues, employees traveled back to the office yard to return the vehicles. The suit argues that the workers’ uncompensated travel time caused their weekly hours to exceed 40 and that the defendants owe them time-and-a-half overtime wages as well as straight-time pay.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.