Fruit Stocker Claims DH Ridgewood Farm Violated Labor Laws
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Boanerges Ayala Canas v. DH Ridgewood Farm, Inc. et al
Filed: January 31, 2018 ◆§ 1:18cv669
DH Ridgewood Farm, Inc. and two individual owners are facing a former employee’s claims that the parties denied him proper wages and other entitlements he should have been afforded under state and federal labor laws.
DH Ridgewood Farm, Inc. and two individual owners are facing a former employee’s claims that the parties denied him proper wages and other entitlements he should have been afforded under state and federal labor laws. The plaintiff says he worked at the defendants’ fruit and vegetable market as a fruit stocker between July 2016 and January 2018. According to the complaint, he typically worked 72 hours per week but did not receive time-and-a-half premium wages for the hours above 40. On top of that, the suit alleges, the plaintiff was paid less than minimum wage and was not provided with spread-of-hours pay when he worked more than 10 hours at a time.
Moreover, the complaint claims the defendants required that employees clock in at the beginning of each shift but never clock out. As a result, the suit alleges, the workers’ wage statements were inaccurate and didn’t account for all their hours worked.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.