Crown Building Maintenance Hit with Former Employee’s Wage and Hour Suit
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Jimenez v. Crown Building Maintenance Co.
Filed: January 5, 2018 ◆§ 1:18cv35
Crown Building Maintenance, Co. is facing a former employee’s proposed class action that claims the defendant failed to pay employees proper wages upon their separation from employment, trimmed their hours, and denied them overtime wages.
Crown Building Maintenance, Co. is facing a former employee’s proposed class action that claims the defendant failed to pay employees proper wages upon their separation from employment, trimmed their hours, and denied them overtime wages. The plaintiff says he was employed as a janitor between 2009 and October 2017 but never received “all [his] earned, vested and determinable wages” after his separation from Crown Building. He argues that the defendant often reported that he and other employees worked fewer hours than they actually worked and subsequently paid them less than they were owed. On top of that, the suit attests, the plaintiff many times worked more than 40 hours per week without receiving time-and-a-half premium wages for the hours he worked above 40.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.