Starbucks Sued For Second Time in Two Days
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Carrington v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Filed: December 21, 2016 ◆§ 3:16-cv-03074-DMS-KSC
A proposed class action filed against Starbucks—the second one in as many days—claims the coffee company violated California labor laws.
A proposed class action filed against Starbucks—the second one in as many days—claims the coffee company violated California labor laws by failing to pay workers for an additional hour (at their regular rate of pay) on shifts in which they worked in excess of five hours before, or without, being provided with a mandatory meal break. The 12-page complaint claims that on multiple occasions the plaintiff worked an initial, uninterrupted five-hour shift segment before (or without) being allowed to take a meal break and without being paid for an additional hour of work as dictated by California labor law.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.