MillerCoors Hit with Wage and Hour Lawsuit in California
Last Updated on March 12, 2019
Cardiel v. MillerCoors LLC
Filed: March 8, 2019 ◆§ 2:19-cv-01727
MillerCoors finds itself as the defendant in a wage and hour lawsuit in which the plaintiff claims the company has failed to pay proper wages, among other infractions.
A lawsuit removed to California federal court alleges MillerCoors LLC employs a consistent policy of failing to pay proper wages, including those due upon separation of employment, and of failing to provide appropriate meal and rest periods and business expense reimbursements.
The plaintiff, who worked at the defendant’s Irwindale brewery, alleges in the 65-page suit that MillerCoors required certain employees to work off the clock and, to the workers’ detriment, engaged in rounding work hours to the nearest quarter- or half-hour. According to the suit, the defendant’s off-the-clock work demands stemmed from “difficult to attain production requirements and demands” placed on workers by managers.
MillerCoors, the case says, automatically deducted a 30-minute meal break from employees’ wages despite the fact that provided meals were “shortened or otherwise interrupted or provided untimely after five hours of shift work.” The suit claims MillerCoors failed to maintain records of meal period times in part because employees were required to swipe ID badges for shift start and end times yet were not required to do so for meal breaks.
The case goes on to allege that the plaintiff and similarly situated employees were systematically underpaid due to both the defendant’s practice of rounding down their work hours and its failure to properly calculate shift differentials owed to those who worked the second or third shift. The plaintiff, moreover, claims MillerCoors failed to factor shift differential pay into workers’ regular hourly rates for the purposes of calculating time-and-a-half and double overtime pay.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuits
If your child suffers from video game addiction — including Fortnite addiction or Roblox addiction — you may be able to take legal action. Gamers 18 to 22 may also qualify.
Learn more:Video Game Addiction Lawsuit
Depo-Provera Lawsuits
Anyone who received Depo-Provera or Depo-Provera SubQ injections and has been diagnosed with meningioma, a type of brain tumor, may be able to take legal action.
Read more: Depo-Provera Lawsuit
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.