Lawsuit: Denville Line Painting Crosses the Line with Illegal Pay Practices
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Stubits v. Denville Line Painting, Inc.
Filed: January 16, 2018 ◆§ 2:18cv649
Denville Line Painting, Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action filed by a former employee who claims he was not paid prevailing wage and supplemental benefit rates for work he performed on publicly funded projects.
Denville Line Painting, Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action filed by a former employee who claims he was not paid prevailing wage and supplemental benefit rates for work he performed on publicly funded projects in New York and New Jersey. According to the suit, the defendant contracted with public entities to perform pavement work and noted in the contracts that workers would be paid according to prevailing wage and supplemental benefit rates, which the complaint says fell between $50 and $80 per hour. The plaintiff says he was paid below these rates for both his straight-time hours and his overtime hours, in violation of the defendant’s contracts and state law.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.