Insurance Agents Dispute Exempt Classification, Claim Unpaid OT
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Arias et al v. Selective Healthcare, LLC et al
Filed: May 1, 2017 ◆§ 0:17-cv-60853-KMM
Two individuals have filed a proposed collective action against their former employer, Selective Healthcare, LLC, and two owners, claiming they were misclassified.
Two individuals have filed a proposed collective action against their former employer, Selective Healthcare, LLC, and two owners. They claim the healthcare company misclassified them as exempt employees and failed to pay them proper overtime wages, as required under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). According to the complaint, health insurance agents like the plaintiffs were paid based on a standard commission structure and did not have any control over most aspects of their jobs, indicating that they cannot qualify as overtime-exempt under the FLSA. From the complaint:
“The Code of Federal Regulations, at 29 C.F.R. §779.317, identifies certain occupations that do not qualify for the exemption found at 29 U.S.C. §207(i), including those engaged in the business of ‘Insurance; mutual, stock and fraternal benefit, including insurance brokers, agents, and claims adjustment offices.’”
“Defendants nonetheless failed and refused to pay Plaintiffs and the class of similarly situated commissioned health insurance agent employees at the rate of time and one half of their regular rate(s) of pay (including non-discretionary commissions earned) for all hours worked over 40 hours in a workweek.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.