Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Facing Class Action Lawsuit Over Alleged Gender Pay Gap
Last Updated on November 15, 2018
Ross et al. v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Filed: November 9, 2018 ◆§ 11111-11111
A lawsuit claims there exists at Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company a wage gap that results in female employees being paid far less than males for similar work.
Two plaintiffs have filed a proposed class action in which they allege there exists at Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company’s (HPE) California offices an “indefensible and unlawful” wage gap between female employees and their male counterparts. The plaintiffs allege in the 26-page complaint that women are disproportionately represented at HPE, comprising roughly one third of the defendant’s total workforce, and are subject to company policies that uniformly result in unequal compensation between the sexes.
The suit charges that HPE’s lack of transparency on the issue has stood in the way of wiping out its gender pay gap. According to the complaint, HPE does not state publicly the specific measures it takes to supposedly address the gender pay disparity, choosing instead to advise employees to “keep their compensation to themselves” and avoid starting discussions with supervisors about how much other employees are paid. Moreover, the case continues, HPE also keeps quiet with regard to its pay grades, which leaves employees unsure about comparable pay scales between males and females. From the case:
“HPE has systematically paid its female employees less than similarly situated males and continues to do so. These discriminatory patterns and practices occur throughout HPE in California. HPE's corporate culture and centralized leadership, and the uniform policies, procedures, and practices inevitably result in systemic pay discrimination to the disadvantage of female employees. Such pay discrimination is manifested in multiple ways, including, without limitation, by: (a) paying Plaintiffs and other female employees less than similarly situated male employees; (b) failing to advance Plaintiffs and other female employees at the same rate as male employees performing equal or substantially similar work; and (c) other adverse employment actions.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.