Classic Party Rentals, One Other Hit with WARN Act Class Action After July Layoffs
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
McDonald v. CP Opco, LLC et al.
Filed: August 23, 2017 ◆§ 3:17-cv-04915
A former employee claims Classic Party Rentals broke the law by failing to provide proper notice before laying off employees after the company was bought.
An individual formerly employed as a distribution supervisor by CP Opco, LLC, which does business as Classic Party Rentals, and its human resources handler Insperity Peo Services, L.P. claims the companies violated the federal and California’s Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) by failing to provide employees with at least 60 days’ notice before a mass layoff on July 11, 2017. The lawsuit notes the defendants employed more than 100 full-time workers around the time of the mass firing. At its Burlingame, California location, where the plaintiff was employed, the defendants employed roughly 135 workers, the case continues.
The plaintiff claims that before Classic Party Rentals was sold to Bright Event Rentals, LLC, the Burlingame location’s general manager assured him that his job was not at risk. What transpired, the case says, was the opposite. From the lawsuit:
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.