We’re well into the dog days of summer – and, if you’re like us, you’ve probably cracked open a few cold ones to beat the heat. If Lime-a-Ritas or White Claws happen to be your drink of choice, you’ll want to keep reading.
To start off this week’s issue, we’re diving into a new settlement involving Snapchat and the privacy of Illinois residents.
In our latest issue, we’re taking a look at an ongoing problem with Wells Fargo – that the bank is allegedly discriminating against Hispanic and Latino people applying to refinance their mortgages.
We have a couple of new investigations on our hands as attorneys working with ClassAction.org are looking into possible defects in a few different vehicle models.
Welcome to the 200th issue of the ClassAction.org newsletter! We don’t have anything special planned, but we do have a reopened investigation and a handful of ongoing cases to tell you about.
In this issue, we’ll touch on a few new and ongoing investigations. First up, attorneys working with ClassAction.org are looking into whether a case could be filed on behalf of Samsung Galaxy watch owners.
For our top story this week, we’re turning our attention to a settlement that looks to compensate Facebook users who visited non-Facebook websites displaying the iconic “Like” button.
To kick things off, a new settlement involving various weed killer products is now accepting claims. We have the details below – but if you bought certain Roundup®, HDX® or Ace® weed killer products, you may be owed money.
In this issue, we’re taking a look at a handful of cases filed over products that may have been misleadingly represented to consumers.
In our latest issue, we’re taking a look at growing privacy concerns surrounding Twitter and the potential for lawsuits to be filed on behalf of consumers.
We’re starting off our latest issue with an investigation that affects patients across the country. Attorneys working with ClassAction.org are looking into whether certain hospitals’ websites are illegally sharing patient information
In this issue, we’re diving right into allegations that have persisted for years – that those driving for Lyft have been misclassified as independent contractors when they’re actually employees.
