Could the Nuna Car Seat Recall Lead to Lawsuits? After Nuna Baby Essentials recalled more than half a million RAVA car seats, attorneys are looking to get a lawsuit on file to compensate those who bought the product. From there, attorneys are investigating a potentially rigged cash gaming app and possible privacy violations affecting users of a couple of popular online shops. We’ll round out this week’s issue with a look at a recently filed case involving a popular travel mug, as well as the latest in class action settlements. Keep reading for the details. - Ty Armstrong, Writer/Community Manager |
| Attorneys are investigating whether a class action can be filed against Nuna Baby Essentials over its recall of 608,786 RAVA car seats with the plastic harness adjuster button due to a defect that can cause the harness to loosen. The attorneys believe that the recall is insufficient with regard to the remedy being offered (a free at-home repair kit) and are looking to instead help consumers recover some of the money they spent on the product. This page outlines the details. |
Blitz - Win Cash Players: Are the Games Rigged? Blitz - Win Cash says there are “no bots allowed” in its mobile games, but attorneys have reason to believe that the app may be secretly populating its games with computer bots posing as live opponents, which allows it to control when players win and when they lose. Attorneys are pursuing legal action against the app’s operator for possible violations of consumer protection laws—so if you lost money on Blitz - Win Cash, learn more and sign up here. |
| New Data Breach Investigations | | | Got a data breach
notice? Don’t throw it out – and check out our full list of ongoing investigations here. You may be able to help get a class action lawsuit started. | |
| | ~ In Case You Missed It ~ Do Your Gummy Supplements Contain as Much Creatine as Advertised? Lab test results published last year have revealed that certain creatine gummies may contain significantly less creatine than indicated on their labels—or even none at all. Attorneys are now looking into whether class action lawsuits can be filed on behalf of those who bought the products. If you live in California, Illinois or New York, find out more here, including which brands are under investigation. |
Case Updates  Our settlements page is always being updated. Have you checked to see if you're covered by any open settlements? You can also check out the latest settlements as they happen by following us on Twitter. |
| Latest Settlements - Daily Harvest French Lentil + Leek Crumbles
You may be included in this settlement if you bought, received or consumed Daily Harvest French Lentil + Leek Crumbles and directly suffered personal injuries from consuming the product. - Upstream Rehabilitation Data Breach
You may be included in this settlement if your personal information was exposed in an Upstream Rehabilitation data breach that occurred between January 24 and January 31, 2023 and between February 3 and February 9, 2023. - Audienceview Ticketing Data Breach
If Audienceview Ticketing Corporation notified you of a data breach that occurred around February 2023, you may be included in this settlement. | | |
To view a complete list of settlements and to find out how you can file a claim, click here. |
|
|---|
| | ~ In Other News ~ | More online shopping sites are under investigation this week as attorneys suspect that Etsy.com and Loft.com may be using secret tracking tools to share user information with third parties. If you bought something on either Etsy.com or Loft.com within the past year, take action and sign up over on this page. The Loft investigation pertains to California residents only, while Etsy is for those in California, Washington, Florida and Pennsylvania. |
| The proposed class action was filed shortly after 2.6 million Switchback and Trigger Action travel mugs were recalled in December 2024 due to a possible burn risk. The recall was issued because of a manufacturing flaw that could cause the lid to loosen and leak or detach completely. The suit claims, however, that Stanley did the “bare minimum” in notifying consumers and is denying requests for refunds. You can find the case details on this page. |
~ Forward to a friend ~
Know someone who might be interested in our newsletter? Why not forward this email to them?
|
|---|
|
|
Please do not reply to this message.
Replies to this message are routed to an unmonitored mailbox. Thank you. |
