United Consumer Financial Services Co. Robocall Class Action Bumped to Ohio Federal Court
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Declue et al v. United Consumer Financial Services Company
Filed: February 22, 2018 ◆§ 1:18cv425
The case claims United Consumer Financial Services Company continued to call the plaintiffs even after the individuals demanded the calls stop.
California
A proposed class action filed against United Consumer Financial Services has landed in U.S. District Court for the North District of Ohio. Initially filed in November 2017 in California federal court, the lawsuit claims the defendant violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) with its practice of placing automatically dialed “robocalls” to the plaintiffs’ cell phones without consent to do so. Moreover, the lawsuit claims the defendant continued to call the plaintiffs even after the individuals demanded the company stop calling while revoking any mistakenly believed express consent.
According to the lawsuit, the calls were placed by the defendant by way of an automatic telephone dialing system, and utilized a technique called “spoofing,” which the lawsuit describes as a common tactic used to trick debtors into answering the phone.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.