Two Plaintiffs Hit DDR Corp. with Suit Over Alleged ADA Violations
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Gellatly et al v. DDR Corp.
Filed: June 6, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-00147-BR
Two plaintiffs with mobility disabilities claim in a proposed class action lawsuit that DDR Corp. systematically discriminates against individuals covered by the ADA.
Two plaintiffs with mobility disabilities claim in a proposed class action lawsuit that defendant DDR Corp. systematically discriminates against individuals covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) due to inaccessible parking lots and travel paths on the company’s properties. The lawsuit claims physical barriers—namely excessive slopes in purportedly accessible parking spaces—at six of the defendant’s properties in Eerie, Pennsylvania caused the plaintiffs and proposed class members “unnecessary difficulty and risk” in violation of the ADA.
The case goes on to allege, citing investigations conducted by the plaintiffs’ counsel, that DDR Corp.-owned properties throughout Arizona, Colorado, and Florida also contain physical ADA violations, including excessively sloped curb ramps and unmarked accessible parking spaces.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.