Stockholder Files Suit Against IXYS, Littelfuse Over Proposed Merger
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Groce III v. IXYS Corporation et al.
Filed: November 8, 2017 ◆§ 4:17-cv-06489-JSW
IXYS Corporation, its board of directors, Iron Merger Co., Inc., and Littelfuse, Inc. are facing another proposed class action over a potential merger between IXYS and Littelfuse.
California
IXYS Corporation, its board of directors, Iron Merger Co., Inc., and Littelfuse, Inc. are facing another proposed class action over a potential merger between IXYS and Littelfuse. The suit takes issue with the allegedly misleading proxy statement filed in connection with the transaction, arguing that it was missing information concerning the valuation analyses performed by IXYS’s financial advisor.
Furthermore, the complaint claims the proxy statement failed to disclose potential conflicts of interest among the board members, such as details of the defendants’ discussions concerning board members’ future employment.
The suit also argues that the defendants withheld information about the background of the sale process, noting that the proxy neglected to mention the reason another interested party decreased its proposal.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.