Sterling Jewelers Facing Class Action in CA Over Recorded Phone Calls
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Madrid v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
Filed: August 24, 2017 ◆§ 3:17-cv-01711-CAB-BGS
Sterling Jewelers unlawfully recorded calls with consumers in California without prior consent, a proposed class action lawsuit alleges.
Sterling Jewelers, Inc., still trudging through a years-old employee arbitration claim over alleged widespread sexual harassment and misconduct, is facing a new proposed class action that claims the company violated California law by recording phone calls with consumers without first obtaining consent to do so. Citing possible violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), the plaintiff claims Sterling called her cell phone in April 2017 and did not, at any point, advise her that the conversation was being recorded.
The case covers a proposed class of consumers in California whose cell phone conversations with Sterling Jewelers were recorded without consent within the last year.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.