Sleep Number Lawsuit Alleges ‘Perpetual’ Sales Are Misleading to Consumers
Evans v. Sleep Number Corporation
Filed: September 24, 2024 ◆§ 1:24-cv-01136
A class action lawsuit alleges Sleep Number has frequently sold mattresses below the advertised strike-through price for periods of 90 days or more.
California Business and Professions Code California Unfair Competition Law California Consumers Legal Remedies Act
California
A proposed class action lawsuit alleges Sleep Number Corporation’s sales are anything but, given that the company has frequently sold mattresses below the advertised strike-through price for periods of 90 days or more.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 25-page false advertising suit accuses Sleep Number of intentionally misleading consumers as to the quality and value of the mattresses it sells online and in brick-and-mortar stores by way of deceptive pricing tactics. In particular, Sleep Number has utilized “inflated, fictitious reference prices” online and in stores that serve to deceive consumers into believing they are receiving a bargain, the filing alleges.
“In short, Defendant’s sales tactics are not offered in good faith and are made for the sole purpose of deceiving and inducing consumers into purchasing products they otherwise would not have purchased,” the Sleep Number lawsuit claims.
The case says that one method used by Sleep Number to deceive consumers is highlighting a fake strike-through price that’s accompanied by a purported discount amount, with a lower purported sale price posted next to the fictitious reference price. Sleep Number will additionally warrant to consumers that they benefit from receiving “X% off” should they buy a mattress at its purported sale price, the filing mentions.
According to the complaint, California law mandates that a former price can only be advertised if it was the prevailing market price within the three months preceding the advertised sale. The Federal Trade Commission likewise has directed sellers to steer clear of touting products as on sale from a purported former price without the item having been actually offered for sale for the apparent reference price for a reasonably substantial period of time, the case relays.
“Defendant did not sell its Products at the advertised strike-through price and had not done so for at least 90 days when Plaintiff made her purchase, but it was likely doing so for much longer,” the suit claims, alleging Sleep Number employs the same deceptive pricing tactics for all its mattress products.
The Sleep Number lawsuit looks to cover all consumers nationwide who bought any Sleep Number mattress within the applicable statute of limitations period.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.