Sixlets Maker Accused of Underfilling Candy Boxes
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Green v. Sweetworks Confections, Llc
Filed: February 1, 2018 ◆§ 1:18cv902
Sweetworks Confections, LLC is facing a proposed class action lawsuit that claims the candy maker underfills its boxes of Sixlets candy and deceives consumers into paying for a product that contains less than what they think they’re getting.
Sweetworks Confections, LLC is facing a proposed class action lawsuit that claims the candy maker underfills its boxes of Sixlets candy and deceives consumers into paying for a product that contains less than what they think they’re getting. The suit alleges that the candy boxes contain a significant amount of “slack-fill,” or “unnecessary empty space,” effectively tricking consumers into “paying for air.” According to the complaint, Sixlets candy boxes contain approximately 60 percent slack-fill, which is not apparent to consumers until they open the packaging.
Further, the defendants allegedly sell Sixlets in another box that is smaller and contains less slack-fill. Therefore, the suit argues, the company “cannot plausibly argue that it could not fit the candy in the Product box into a smaller box, because it has already done exactly this, placing the same quantity of candy in a box that is approximately half the size.”
An image from the complaint has been included below:
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.