Saint Paul, MN Police Chief Named in Class Action Alleging Unlawful Seizure of Firearms
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Sande v. Todd Axtell
Filed: September 25, 2017 ◆§ 0:17-cv-04386-WMW-BRT
The police chief of St. Paul, MN has been named in a class action over the alleged unlawful seizure and non-return of a registered firearm.
Saint Paul, Minnesota Chief of Police Todd Axtell is the defendant in a proposed class action lawsuit that alleges he, in his official capacity, violated the Constitution after officers under his oversight unlawfully seized a registered firearm from the plaintiff during a vehicle stop.
The lawsuit notes that the plaintiff and a passenger were pulled over by Saint Paul police officers in unmarked vehicles in July 2015. Before the plaintiff’s vehicle was searched, the man, who the lawsuit says is licensed to carry a gun, informed one of the officers that he had a firearm in the door of the vehicle. During the search, the case continues, officers found “a small amount of marijuana and a digital scale.” The firearm and marijuana and scale were seized, the lawsuit says, and the plaintiff was reportedly released within an hour of interviewing with an officer.
The case takes issue with the officers’ alleged refusal to return the plaintiff’s firearm. The man claims in the case that he made several inquiries into the return of his gun, and was informed in December 2015 via letter that he could come to the Saint Paul Police Department to retrieve his property. Upon doing so, the lawsuit alleges, the plaintiff was denied his firearm. Subsequent requests for the return of his weapon, made as recently as August 2017, have yielded nothing, the lawsuit claims.
“In a letter to the plaintiff, the defendant, through a subordinate, told the plaintiff that ‘it is the decision of the Saint Paul Police Department to deny [his] request,’” the case reads, further stating the letter advised the plaintiff that his firearm was sent for ballistic testing and will remain in possession of the Saint Paul PD until July of next year.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuits
If your child suffers from video game addiction — including Fortnite addiction or Roblox addiction — you may be able to take legal action. Gamers 18 to 22 may also qualify.
Learn more:Video Game Addiction Lawsuit
Depo-Provera Lawsuits
Anyone who received Depo-Provera or Depo-Provera SubQ injections and has been diagnosed with meningioma, a type of brain tumor, may be able to take legal action.
Read more: Depo-Provera Lawsuit
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.