Renewal by Andersen Hit with Robocall Class Action Lawsuit in New Jersey
Last Updated on July 25, 2018
Johnson v. Moore Holdings, LLC
Filed: July 16, 2018 ◆§ 2:18-cv-11650-JLL-JAD
Moore Holdings, which operates as Renewal by Andersen, allegedly placed autodialed calls to consumers' cell phones without first obtaining prior express consent.
New Jersey
A proposed class action removed to New Jersey federal court details allegations that defendant Moore Holdings, Inc.—operating as Renewal by Andersen—placed unlawful, autodialed telemarketing calls to consumers’ cell phones without prior express written consent.
According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff had no prior business relationship with the defendant nor provided written consent before receiving calls to her cell phone. The calls reportedly began after the plaintiff called Renewal by Andersen to inquire about whether the company did work on basement windows.
“Over the following months,” the case says, “[the defendant] proceeded to call [the plaintiff] dozens of times to advertise its other services."
The complaint goes on to mention that the internet “is full of complaints about unwanted calls” from Moore Holdings, with each call supposedly placed via an automatic telephone dialing system, sometimes to numbers included in the National Do Not Call Registry.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.