Real Time Resolutions Allegedly Hides Consumer Rights in Collection Letters
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
O'Boyle v. Real Time Resolutions Inc
Filed: July 12, 2017 ◆§ 2:17-cv-00957-LA
A Wisconsin woman has filed suit against Real Time Resolutions, Inc. claiming the defendant failed to clearly communicate in a collection letter her rights under federal law.
Wisconsin
A Wisconsin woman has filed suit against Real Time Resolutions, Inc. claiming the defendant failed to clearly communicate in a collection letter her rights under federal law. According to the complaint, debt collectors are required to “clearly and conspicuously” inform consumers of their right to dispute an alleged debt. The suit argues that the plaintiff’s collection letter included a validation notice, but unlawfully placed it on a separate page where it was overshadowed by additional information. From the complaint:
“If a debt collector wants to put the validation notice somewhere other than the front of the collection letter, there must be clear and conspicuous language on the front of the letter explaining this to the debtor.”
The front of the letter allegedly failed to direct the plaintiff to the validation notice and therefore violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, according to the suit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.