Rancher Alleges SD Livestock Brand Board, Auction Stole Sales Proceeds for ‘Kickbacks’
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Stanko v. Schofield et al
Filed: July 28, 2017 ◆§ 5:17-cv-05060-JLV
A rancher claims the South Dakota Brand Board and an auction company 'conspired to confiscate' nearly $60,000 from livestock producers.
A proposed class action has been filed in South Dakota against the state’s Brand Board, its inspector, and Philip Livestock Auction and its owner alleging the parties have illegally, unconstitutionally and without due-process taken more than $59,400 from livestock producers. The 15-page complaint, filed on behalf of Pine Ridge Reservation cattle ranchers who bring livestock to Philip Livestock Auction for sale, cites alleged violations of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
The plaintiff, a large feeder and rancher who the case says bought and sold more than $10 million worth of cattle last year, argues the laws and regulations of the South Dakota Brand Board do not apply “on or coming off” the Pine Ridge Reservation since the state had ceded the land to Native American tribes when South Dakota was admitted to the Union in 1889. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff delivered 47 yearlings— year- or two-year-old cattle—to the defendants on July 25, 2017 that were branded with the man’s “Bar Mill Iron” brand on their left shoulders, ribs, and hips. These yearlings were allegedly sold to a buyer for $60,297.68, but the plaintiff says he has not received payment for the livestock.
The lawsuit alleges Philip Livestock Auction and the South Dakota brand board’s inspector conspired to confiscate the plaintiff’s net receipt from the sale, totaling $59,420.36, without probable cause. The case continues that the alleged scheme was put into motion when, on July 25, the inspector defendant allegedly signed off on a note “under the guise of South Dakota conspiring with [Philip Livestock] to confiscate and/or steal” the plaintiff’s earnings from the sale.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuits
If your child suffers from video game addiction — including Fortnite addiction or Roblox addiction — you may be able to take legal action. Gamers 18 to 22 may also qualify.
Learn more:Video Game Addiction Lawsuit
Depo-Provera Lawsuits
Anyone who received Depo-Provera or Depo-Provera SubQ injections and has been diagnosed with meningioma, a type of brain tumor, may be able to take legal action.
Read more: Depo-Provera Lawsuit
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.