ProCollect Accused of Miscommunicating Consumer’s Debt Dispute Rights
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Cagle v. ProCollect, Inc.
Filed: November 9, 2017 ◆§ 0:17-cv-62194-DPG
ProCollect, Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit claiming it miscommunicated a consumer’s rights regarding debt disputes.
ProCollect, Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit claiming it miscommunicated a consumer’s rights regarding debt disputes. The plaintiff in the case, a Florida resident, says he received a collection letter from the defendant that contained a required Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) disclosure informing him that he would be given 30 days to dispute his alleged debt or request validation. The letter also mentioned, according to the complaint, that “[in] this same written notice,” the plaintiff could request the name and address of his original creditor.
The suit claims the defendant’s demand that the plaintiff dispute the debt in order to obtain his original creditor’s information was unlawful under the FDCPA, which, according to the complaint, provides that consumers may submit this request separately without disputing the debt.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.