Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I Among Nine Defendants in ADA Class Action
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Badger et al v. Phillips Edison Grocery Center Reit I, Inc. et al
Filed: November 28, 2017 ◆§ 2:17cv1549
A complaint filed in Pennsylvania claims Phillips Edison Company facilities contain physical accessibility barriers in parking lots and travel paths.
Pennsylvania
Two plaintiffs with mobility disabilities have filed a proposed class action lawsuit in Pennsylvania against Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc. (which does business as Phillips Edison & Company) and the below defendants over alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):
- Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT II, Inc.
- Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership I, LP
- Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating Partnership II, LP
- Phillips Edison Grocery Center OP GP I LLC
- PE Grocery Center OP GP II LLC
- Phillips Edison NTR LLC
- Phillips Edison NTR II LLC
- Phillips Edison Limited Partnership
The plaintiffs’ lawsuit stems from alleged accessibility barriers found in parking lots and travel paths at the defendants’ facilities, which include various real estate properties (the REIT defendants) and “grocery-anchored neighborhood and community shopping centers,” nationwide. According to the complaint, the plaintiffs’ experiences at the defendants’ facilities—that they were allegedly denied full and equal access—are not isolated episodes, but rather examples of systematic discrimination against individuals with mobility disabilities.
The specific facilities mentioned in the complaint from which the plaintiffs say they’ve personally been denied full and equal access, all in Pittsburgh, reportedly represent only a few of the defendants’ supposedly non-ADA-compliant locations. The case also notes facilities in Gibsonia, Pennsylvania; Burbank, Illinois; and Golden and Broomfield, Colorado as having ostensibly handicapped-accessible parking spaces with excessive slopes and excessively sloped curb ramps, among other alleged infractions.
The lawsuit asks the court for a permanent injunction to require the defendants to remedy the supposed accessibility barriers at their facilities, as well as update their policies to prevent future issues and submit to monitoring to ensure said injunctive relief is properly implemented.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.