Panera Class Action Lawsuit Claims Sprouted Grain Bagel Flats Contain Only ‘Trace Amounts’ of Sprouted Grains
Tate v. Panera, LLC et al.
Filed: April 12, 2024 ◆§ 2:24-cv-03007
A class action lawsuit alleges Panera has misled consumers about its sprouted grain bagel flats since they are made mostly with less-healthy, non-sprouted grains.
California Business and Professions Code California Unfair Competition Law California Consumers Legal Remedies Act
California
A proposed class action lawsuit alleges Panera has misled consumers about its sprouted grain bagel flats since they are made mostly with “less-healthy, non-sprouted grains” and contain only trace amounts of their key advertised ingredient.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 19-page Panera lawsuit claims the fast-casual restaurant chain has deceived consumers into believing sprouted grains are the exclusive or primary source of grain in the bagels at issue. The filing contends that consumers would not have bought Panera’s sprouted grain bagel flats, or would have paid less for them, had they known the bagels consisted mostly of “conventional, non-sprouted grains,” with very little actual sprouted grains.
Per the complaint, “sprouted grain blend” is listed last in the Panera Sprouted Grain Bagel Flats ingredients list, meaning the item consists of more salt and yeast than actual sprouted grain flour. Specifically, the bagel flats likely consist of less than 0.4 percent actual sprouted grains, the case calculates.
“As such, the advertising of the Product as ‘sprouted grain’ is false and deceptive,” the lawsuit states.
The suit contends that the impression that the Panera bagel flats have sprouted grains as their main source of grain is critical to consumers when making a purchasing decision. In particular, sprouted grains contain fewer starches, have lower carbohydrate content, are easier to digest, and have a lower gylcemic index in comparison to regular grains, the case notes.
“In contrast, the processed wheat and white flour, primarily used in the Product by Panera, is stripped of its nutritional components, including fiber, vitamins, and minerals, thus offering minimal nutritional value,” according to the suit.
The lawsuit looks to cover California residents who, within the applicable statute of limitations period, bought a sprouted grain bagel flat from Panera.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.