Optimum Outcomes Sent ‘Misleading and Confusing’ Debt Notice, Case Claims
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Neumer v. Optimum Outcomes Inc
Filed: July 24, 2017 ◆§ 2:17-cv-01027
A consumer's class action takes issue with an allegedly 'misleading and confusing' collection notice sent by Optimum Outcomes.
From Wisconsin comes a proposed class action alleging defendant Optimum Outcomes, Inc. sent a consumer a “misleading and confusing” collection notice over a balance reportedly owed to Comenity Bank. The complaint claims the notice the plaintiff received stated that the balance pertained to a “date of service” for July 1, 2016, yet in another place in the same letter stated the balance includes amounts for two accounts, with dates of service of July 1 and July 12, 2016.
“The unsophisticated consumer reading [the collection notice] could not be sure which amount Optimum was actually attempting to collect,” the complaint claims, elaborating that the defendant’s alleged conduct is “ambiguous and unclear” and in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.