OHM Concession Group Facing Illinois BIPA Class Action Over Use, Storage of Employees’ Biometric Data
Komorski v. OHM Concession Group, LLC et al.
Filed: January 8, 2019 ◆§ 1:19-cv-00157
A class action alleges OHM Concession Group and its bio-tech providers violated the Illinois BIPA by failing to obtain proper consent before capturing and storing fingerprints.
OHM Concession Group, LLC OHM Chicago, LLC Global Payments, Inc. Cross Match Technologies, Inc.
Illinois
OHM Concession Group is among four defendants facing litigation over alleged violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit, a proposed class action removed from Illinois circuit to district court, claims restaurant and concessions management companies OHM and OHM Chicago and their biometric technology providers Global Payments and Cross Match Technologies captured, stored, used, or otherwise disseminated employees’ biometric data—fingerprints—without obtaining proper consent to do so.
Highlighting the “grave privacy risks” associated with companies employing biometric technology as a means of cracking down on timekeeping fraud, the lawsuit explains the Illinois BIPA was enacted to address concerns about the collection, use, retention and dissemination of workers’ biometric identifiers. The law mandates that employers who collect biometric data inform employees in writing that their biometric data will be collected or stored and of the specific purpose and length of the term for which their biometric identifiers will be stored. Further, employers must receive a written release from the employee whose information will be collected, as well as publish a publicly available retention schedule for permanently destroying the data.
The defendants, the lawsuit alleges, failed to obtain informed written consent from OHM’s employees before capturing their biometric data. Moreover, the suit charges the defendants “failed to bargain honestly” with employees at the outset of their employment by failing to disclose “the unlawful nature of the timekeeping system in which they would be required to participate.”
“To the extent Defendants are still retaining Plaintiff’s biometrics, such retention is unlawful,” the suit alleges. “Plaintiff would not have provided her biometric data to Defendants had she known the same would remain with Defendants for an indefinite period or subject [sic] to unauthorized disclosure.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.