Not Smoked? Lawsuit Claims Consumers Misled by Kroger’s ‘Smoked Gouda’ Label [DISMISSED]
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on April 2, 2024
Kinman v. The Kroger Co.
Filed: February 28, 2021 ◆§ 1:21-cv-01154
The label of Kroger’s Private Selection “Smoked Gouda” cheese fails to disclose that its smoked flavor comes from artificial additives, a lawsuit alleges.
April 2, 2024 – Judge Tosses Kroger Private Selection “Smoked Gouda” Cheese Lawsuit
A federal judge ruled in favor of Kroger in the proposed class action lawsuit described on this page on March 20, 2024.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
In an eight-page opinion and order issued that day, United States District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins granted the Kroger Co.’s September 2023 motion for summary judgment on the claims outlined in the plaintiff's second amended complaint.
In the order, Judge Jenkins cited “unrebutted evidence” presented by Kroger that the cheese at issue is indeed smoked over hardwood. According to court documents, the retailer submitted a declaration from the president of Biery Cheese Co., from which the defendant sources the product, that states the gouda cheese is “subjected to both hot and cold smoking over wood chips, and that this process ‘predominately’ provides the Product’s smoky flavor.”
The judge wrote that Kroger’s conduct, as such, was neither misleading nor deceptive, as the plaintiff “wanted gouda cheese that was smoked over hardwood, and that is what she got.”
“Ultimately, [the plaintiff’s] arguments do not meaningfully attempt to dispute the crucial fact on which this lawsuit rests: the Product is wood-smoked,” Judge Jenkins summarized.
Court records show that the case was terminated the same day, March 20, 2024.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The Kroger Co.’s Private Selection “Smoked Gouda” cheese is misleadingly labeled in that the front of the package fails to disclose that the product’s smoked flavor comes from artificial additives, a proposed class action alleges.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
According to the lawsuit, reasonable consumers have been misled into paying a premium price for a product they believed to be free from flavor additives, and derived its flavor from the actual process of smoking, based on the “smoked” gouda’s labeling. Moreover, given that gouda is a relatively common product, a reasonable consumer would have no reason to “double check” the veracity of what’s stated on the cheese’s front label, according to the case.
“Reasonable consumers must and do rely on defendant to honestly disclose the source of the Product’s flavor,” the complaint states. “Defendant misrepresented the Product through affirmative statements, half-truths, and omissions.”
Smoking is a food processing method that preserves or improves the flavor of a food by exposing it to smoke, usually from burning wood, the lawsuit explains. Consumers prefer foods whose flavors are derived from their characterizing ingredient or a natural production process—such as smoking—rather than from added artificial flavors, the suit says.
The case alleges that because the Private Selection “Smoked” gouda product is labeled as having a “distinctive, smoky flavor,” reasonable consumers would expect that the cheese gets its flavor from the process of being smoked. In truth, however, the product’s ingredients list reveals that the cheese contains “smoke flavor,” which is “smoke condensed into a liquid form,” the suit relays.
Per the case, the “smoked” gouda product “has not undergone any smoking” and instead derives its taste from flavor additives. According to the suit, testing commissioned by the plaintiff’s counsel revealed that the added smoke flavor “is not able to impart the same, real smoked taste of real smoking” given it lacks “threshold amounts” of certain phenolic compounds normally present when a food is smoked.
The case argues that the Private Selection “smoked” gouda’s front label is misleading to consumers in that it fails to “say anything about the source of the smoky flavor.” The lawsuit says food labeling laws require a product’s front label to disclose the source of the product’s characterizing flavor.
The lawsuit, which echoes similar cases filed over Dietz & Watson’s “Smoked Gouda” and “Smoked Provolone” products and Aldi’s “Smoked White Cheddar” cheese, claims consumers would not have purchased Kroger’s “Smoked” gouda, or would have paid less for it, had they known the true source of the cheese’s flavor.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.