Nonprofit Sues City of Chicago over Constitutionality of Shared Housing
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Keep Chicago Livable et al v. City of Chicago
Filed: November 4, 2016 ◆§ 1:16-cv-10371
Keep Chicago Livable and others have filed a class action against the city of Chicago to challenge the constitutionality of the city's controversial Shared Housing.
Keep Chicago Livable and others have filed a class action against the city of Chicago to challenge the constitutionality of the city’s controversial Shared Housing Ordinance, a measure set to go into effect on December 19, 2016 that purportedly aims to regulate “the phenomenon of home sharing on internet sites,” such as Airbnb, HomeAway, FlipKet and others. The plaintiff, a non-profit formed by Chicago residents, says the new law, while appearing on its surface to be merely regulatory, is actually a de facto ban on the use of online home sharing services, which “violates the constitutional rights of Chicagoans” to communicate freely and anonymously on the internet and use their own private property.
Described by the Chicago Tribune as “dizzyingly complex,” the Shared Housing Ordinance, the complaint alleges, violates the Stored Communications Act by calling for third-party internet service providers to share with the city users’ personal information, transactional histories and other sensitive data without a search warrant. Additionally, on an economic level, the lawsuit says the law creates a trap for unwary renters who may not know that Shared Housing Ordinance rules call for fines of between $3,000 and $5,000 per day per violation, penalties that are “buried inside 57 pages of dense and impenetrable legalese” city authorities knew regular citizens would never read nor understand.
The proposed class covered by the lawsuit is made up of two subclasses: hosts and guests.
The proposed host subclass includes:
- All Chicago residents who own or lease property in the City of Chicago who list their property or a room therein online on platforms such as Airbnb, VRBO, TripAdvisor and similar sites to engage in transient occupancy in exchange for consideration
The proposed guest class includes:
- Anyone who has ever been a guest of a Chicago resident who owns or leases property in the city and who posted a listing on any of the aforementioned online accommodation sites
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.