Morgan Stanley Unlawfully Requests Job Applicants’ Protected Criminal History Information, Class Action Alleges
Doe v. Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC
Filed: December 15, 2023 ◆§ 2384CV02850
Morgan Stanley faces a class action wherein a job applicant claims the company rescinded her job offer after unlawfully requesting her protected criminal history information.
Morgan Stanley & Co. faces a proposed class action wherein a job applicant claims the investment banking company rescinded her job offer after unlawfully requesting her protected criminal history information.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The nine-page lawsuit alleges Morgan Stanley has run afoul of Massachusetts law by asking applicants to disclose certain criminal history data protected by state statutes, storing records of the information and using application forms that request it.
The plaintiff, a Black woman who resides in Massachusetts, says she was offered a position at a Morgan Stanley office in Boston in May 2022. As part of the onboarding screening process, she was required to undergo a criminal background check, the suit relays.
In an email sent to the plaintiff in early July of that year, the company asked her to provide further details about parts of her criminal history, including information protected under state law, the case shares.
Specifically, the woman was asked to provide police and/or incident reports and court documentation for arrests that did not lead to convictions, the complaint states. In addition, Morgan Stanley requested she include a “detailed narrative of the facts and circumstances” of each incident, the filing says.
The lawsuit notes that criminal history involving arrests that do not lead to convictions, among other data, is protected under Massachusetts law. As such, the suit claims the company violated these statutes by asking the plaintiff to provide additional details about these incidents.
Per the case, the plaintiff was told by Morgan Stanley on August 12, 2022 that her job offer had been withdrawn. The complaint shares that although the woman asked if there were other positions at the company for which she would be eligible, she was informed that “Morgan Stanley did not hire anyone with any criminal record as a matter of company policy.”
“It is well documented that communities of color, including Black communities, are arrested and convicted at rates significantly higher than the white population,” the filing states.
The suit argues that “for every 100 White men, about 6 are expected to serve time in prison, but for every 100 Black men, about 33 are expected to serve time in prison.”
The plaintiff claims that given these statistics and the company’s hiring policies, Morgan Stanley used her protected criminal history information to discriminate against her in violation of state law.
The lawsuit looks to represent anyone who applied for employment in Massachusetts at Morgan Stanley within the applicable statute of limitations period and was subjected to unlawful inquiries or actions regarding protected criminal history information.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.