MCM Accused of Miscommunicating Consumer’s Debt Dispute Rights
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Robbins v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Filed: April 3, 2018 ◆§ 3:18-cv-00654
Midland Credit Management, Inc. (MCM) is on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit alleging the debt collector miscommunicated a consumer’s right to dispute his purported debt.
Pennsylvania
Midland Credit Management, Inc. (MCM) is on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit alleging the debt collector miscommunicated a consumer’s right to dispute his purported debt. According to the complaint, the plaintiff received a collection letter instructing him to “send disputes or an instrument tendered as full satisfaction of a debt to” the defendant’s physical address. This was followed in the notice by a statement indicating he “may also call” the provided telephone number. The case argues that “to be effective, a dispute of a debt must be made in writing,” noting that only a written dispute will invoke the protections provided under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The defendant’s reference to a telephone number was meant to rob the plaintiff of his FDCPA rights concerning debt disputes, the lawsuit alleges, and constitutes an “abusive debt collection activity.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.