Managed Recovery Systems Hit with FDCPA Class Action
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Strak v. Managed Recovery Systems Inc et al
Filed: January 18, 2017 ◆§ 6:17-cv-00159-BHH
From South Carolina district court comes a proposed class action claiming defendant Managed Recovery Systems violated the terms of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
South Carolina
From South Carolina district court comes a proposed class action claiming defendant Managed Recovery Systems violated the terms of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The lawsuit claims the defendant sent the plaintiff a collection notice that included the below language:
“UNLESS YOU NOTIFY THIS OFFICE IN WRITING WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIVING THIS NOTICE TO DISPUTE THE VALIDITY OF THIS DEBT OR ANY PORTION OF IT, WE WILL ASSUME THE DEBT IS VALID.”
According to the complaint, the above language is unlawful because it could lead the least sophisticated consumer, i.e. the metaphorical benchmark in FDCPA lawsuits, to believe that only one option exists to dispute the validity of a debt. The plaintiff specifically alleges the defendants failed in their obligation to provide the mandatory validation notice “effectively and clearly.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.