Lyft Capital Robocalled Consumers without Consent, Class Action Claims
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Martin v. Lyft Capital, Inc.
Filed: November 2, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-24042-CMA
A lawsuit claims the business loan company robocalled called consumers using an artificial or prerecorded voice message without consent.
Lyft Capital, Inc. (no affiliation with the other Lyft) is the defendant in a proposed class action that claims the business loan company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) when it placed automatically dialed calls to consumers’ cell phones without consent. The lawsuit, filed in Florida, claims the plaintiff began receiving calls from Lyft Capital in September 2017 in which the individual “heard a clicking noise and/or a delay followed by an artificial or prerecorded voice message.” The lawsuit alleges the defendant placed at least four calls to the plaintiff’s cell phone for marketing purposes without consent.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.