Lawsuit: ShoreTel Proxy Statement Missing Information Concerning Merger
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Frydman v. ShoreTel, Inc. et al.
Filed: August 22, 2017 ◆§ 5:17-cv-04865
A stockholder filed a proposed class action lawsuit against ShoreTel, Inc. and its board of directors over an allegedly misleading proxy statement the defendants filed in connection with Mitel Networks Corporation’s potential acquisition of the company.
A stockholder filed a proposed class action lawsuit back in August against ShoreTel, Inc. and its board of directors over an allegedly misleading proxy statement the defendants filed in connection with Mitel Networks Corporation’s potential acquisition of the company. Specifically, the suit claims the proxy statement is missing details of ShoreTel’s financial projections and “key inputs and assumptions” used in the financial analyses performed by its financial advisor. The plaintiff claims the statement also failed to disclose the percentage of shares owned by company executives that had been pledged in support of the merger, which he argues is material information to stockholders.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.