Lawsuit: Second Round, LP Failed to Disclose Settlement Payment Would Revive Debt’s Statute of Limitations
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Kempler v. Second Round, LP
Filed: April 17, 2018 ◆§ 0:18cv60851
A FL consumer claims Second Round, LP offered to settle her debt without informing her payment or partial payment could open her up to litigation.
A Florida consumer has filed a proposed class action in which she claims Second Round, LP mailed her a collection notice that offered to settle a supposed debt without disclosing that payment toward the amount would effectively reset its statute of limitations.
The plaintiff claims she received a letter over a supposed $1,595 obligation for which the case says the woman “bore no legal responsibility” and “could face no legal exposure” by not paying the requested amount. The defendant’s notice allegedly presented the plaintiff two settlement offers: 14 monthly payments of $75, or one payment of $797.50. Not included among the defendant’s settlement offers was a disclosure informing the plaintiff that the statute of limitations on the $1,595 amount would effectively restart should she make full or partial payment, the complaint says.
The defendant’s alleged conduct is characterized in the lawsuit as “false, deceptive or misleading” within the scope of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.