Lawsuit: MRS BPO Uses False Implications to Discourage Debt Settlement
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 30, 2018
Rottenstein, Individually And on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Mrs Bpo, L.L.C. et al
Filed: May 18, 2018 ◆§ 7:18cv4455
MRS BPO, LLC is facing a lawsuit alleging the company falsely implied to a New York consumer that paying off her purported debt in full rather than settling for a discounted amount would improve her chances of being approved for future services.
MRS BPO, LLC is on the receiving end of a proposed class action alleging the company falsely implied to a New York consumer that paying off her alleged debt in full rather than settling for a discounted amount would improve her chances of being approved for future credit services. According to the complaint, the defendant sent the plaintiff a collection letter regarding a debt allegedly owed to Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A. The letter reportedly offered the woman several settlement options but warned her that if she settled her obligation, “Chase may offer you less favorable terms in the future for some Chase products or services or may deny your application.”
The lawsuit argues that this statement implies full payment of the debt would enhance the plaintiff’s likelihood of obtaining future credit extensions or better terms, which the case claims is “false and deceptive.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.