Lawsuit: Forster & Garbus LLP Sent Deceptive Debt Collection Notice
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Mierov v. Forster & Garbus LLP
Filed: February 9, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-00747
A proposed class action filed in New York claims Forster & Garbus LLP violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
A proposed class action filed in New York claims Forster & Garbus LLP violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) when it allegedly sent the plaintiff a collection notice that failed to mention whether the balance owed was continually accruing interest and fees. The case claims that due to the defendant’s alleged conduct, the plaintiff “was left uncertain as to whether the balance due was accruing interest,” and if it would remain static or increase due to undisclosed fees. Similarly, a debt collector’s failure to disclose whether a debt amount is accruing interest could lead the unsophisticated consumer to mistakenly believe payment of the amount listed on a collection notice would satisfy the debt.
Depo-Provera Lawsuits
Anyone who received Depo-Provera or Depo-Provera SubQ injections and has been diagnosed with meningioma, a type of brain tumor, may be able to take legal action.
Read more:Depo-Provera Lawsuit
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.