Lawsuit: Diversified Consultants’ Ambiguous Phone Calls Violated Federal Laws
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Muhlstock v. Diversified Consultants Inc.
Filed: November 8, 2017 ◆§ 2:17-cv-06492
Diversified Consultants Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit alleging it placed autodialed phone calls to a consumer's cell phone without clearly identifying itself as a debt collector.
New York
Diversified Consultants Inc. is on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit alleging it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by placing autodialed phone calls to a consumer’s cell phone without clearly identifying itself as a debt collector. The complaint claims the defendant used autodialing technology to call the plaintiff more than 12 times between November 3 and November 22, 2016 without leaving any voice messages. When the plaintiff allegedly returned the calls on November 22, the defendant’s representative “refused to identify her employer,” according to the complaint, despite the FDCPA’s requirement that debt collectors clearly identify themselves to consumers as debt collectors attempting to collect debts.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.