Lawsuit Claims L3 Technologies Pulled Background Reports without Proper Authorization
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Estes v. L3 Technologies, Inc.
Filed: November 21, 2017 ◆§ 3:17-cv-02356-H-JMA
Per a lawsuit, L3 Technologies unlawfully inserted a 'liability release provision' into its authorization form for pulling job-related background reports.
L3 Technologies, Inc. is on the wrong side of a proposed class action in which the plaintiff claims the communications company unlawfully inserted a “liability release provision” into its form granting the company authorization to pull the man’s background report for job purposes. The case argues that L3 Technologies violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), which “requires that a disclosure consist solely of the disclosure that a consumer report may be obtained for employment purposes,” by including this liability waiver.
From the lawsuit:
“No extraneous information can be attached or included on the consent form. The authorization and disclosure must be stand-alone.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.