Lakanto Products Sweetened Mostly with Cheaper Sugar Alcohol, Not Monk Fruit, Class Action Claims

New to ClassAction.org? Read our Newswire Disclaimer

A proposed class action alleges certain Lakanto products are not sweetened with monk fruit as advertised but predominantly with erythritol, a highly processed and cheaper sugar alcohol known to be “disruptive to gut health.”

The 23-page lawsuit against manufacturer Saraya USA says that erythritol is generally derived from “GMO cornstarch.” Ingestion of erythritol, like other sugar alcohols, can cause “digestive problems, diarrhea, bloating, cramps, gas, nausea, and headaches,” the case states. 

Conversely, monk fruit sweetener is made from the extract of the luo han guo fruit and known to be high in antioxidants and “less processed” than erythritol, the filing relays. 

As such, the case contends, monk fruit is considered to be a more premium, and thus more expensive, sweetener. The lawsuit claims the price difference between monk fruit and erythritol has given Saraya “a financial motive” in labeling the following products in “a deceptive manner”: 

• Sugar-Free Maple Syrup; 
• Sugar-Free Suntella Chocolate Sunflower Spread; 
• Sugar-Free Drinking Chocolate; 
• Sugar-Free Brownie Mix; 
• Sugar-Free Pancake & Baking Mix; 
• Sugar-Free Blueberry Muffin Mix; 
• Keto Granola; 
• Sugar-Free Pumpkin Spice Muffin & Bread Mix; 
• Sugar-Free Cookie Mix; 
• Sugar-Free Chocolate Syrup; 
• Sugar-Free Chocolate Chips; 
• Sugar-Free Simple Flavoring Syrup; 
• Sugar-Free Chocolate Bark; 
• Sugar-Free Chocolate Bars; 
• Sugar-Free Matcha Latte Drink Mix; 
• Chocolate Covered Almonds; 
• Peanut Butter Powder; 
• Dark Chocolate Peanut Butter Cups;
• Sugar-Free Lemon Poppy Seed Muffin Mix; 
• Sugar-Free Chocolate Truffles; 
• Sugar-Free Banana Nut Muffin and Bread Mix;
• Sugar-Free Chocolate Chip Cookie Mix; 
• Sugar-Free Dark Chocolate Sunflower Butter Cups;
• Keto Candied Nuts; 
• Sugar-Free Double Chocolate Muffin Mix; 
• Sugar-Free Double Chocolate Cookie Mix;
• Keto Mini Crunchy Cookies; 
• Sugar-Free Cake Mix; 
• Sugar-Free Chocolate Peppermint Cookie Mix; 
• Almond Butter Vanilla Flavored Spread; 
• Chocolate Covered Peanuts; 
• All Purpose Bread Mix; 
• Peanut Butter Spread; 
• Cookie Butter Sunflower Spread; 
• Simple Syrup Caramel; and 
• Chocolate Covered Almonds. 

The lawsuit argues that the belief that the above-listed products are sweetened with monk fruit was a “significant factor” in consumers’ decision to buy the items, in particular given that monk fruit is “considered to be one of the most premium sweeteners available on the market” and more valued than the less nutritious, cheaper erythritol. 

“Thus, Defendant promises premium products, but provides consumers with cheaper, less premium alternatives,” the case alleges. 

According to the suit, Saraya “knew or should have known” that consumers would rely on its representations yet nonetheless “deceptively advertises” the items as sweetened with monk fruit. Consumers would not have bought the Lakanto products, or would have paid less for them, had they known they were sweetened with less-desirable erythritol, the complaint says. 

The lawsuit looks to cover California residents who purchased any of the Lakanto products listed on this page within the applicable statute of limitations period. 

Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.