Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C. Facing Debt Collection Lawsuit in New York
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Medzhidzade v. Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C.
Filed: November 6, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-06452
A consumer alleges Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C. used 'deceptive' tactics in a collection notice meant to coerce payment on a debt.
New York
A proposed class action out of New York claims debt collector Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C. violated federal law by implying in a collection notice that the plaintiff’s balance may increase despite being aware the balance will not vary at all. Describing the defendant’s supposed tactics as “deceptive,” the lawsuit claims the company’s inclusion of zero-balances for “Total Amount of Interest Accrued since Charge-Off”; “Total Amount of Non-Interest Charges or Fees Accrued since Charge-off”; and “Total Amount of Payments and Credits made on the Debt since the Charge-Off” amounts to an empty threat meant to coerce payment out of the plaintiff. Further, the case argues the mere threat of a balance increase overshadows certain language required under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.