Juul Labs, Philip Morris, Altria Hit with Class Action Alleging WV Consumer Protection Law Violations Over Youth Marketing
Last Updated on August 16, 2019
R. E. et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
Filed: August 13, 2019 ◆§ 2:19cv591
Juul Labs faces a class action centered on alleged violations of West Virginia consumer protection law with regard to its youth-focused advertising and marketing of the Juul e-cigarette.
West Virginia
A proposed class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of two minors who allege Juul Labs, Altria Group and Philip Morris USA have violated West Virginia consumer protection law by preying on young people with Big Tobacco-style marketing and advertising in order to sell the Juul vaporizer.
Altria owns a 35-percent stake in Juul, the country’s top e-cigarette maker, and in Philip Morris, the name behind the Marlboro brand of cigarettes, the case opens, noting that Altria’s infusion of cash and infrastructure has allowed Juul to put significant muscle into pushing its Juul vaporizer as sales of traditional cigarettes wane. Citing the West Virginia Consumer Protection Act (WVCPA), the 65-page lawsuit says the defendants have used “fraudulent and deceptive youth marketing business practices” to exploit themes that resonate with teenagers “while falsely denying doing so.” Their product, the plaintiffs argue, is responsible for rising nicotine addiction among young people.
The case states that when Juul launched its e-cigarette, which promised no throat-feel while delivering stronger nicotine doses, the company made no mention of the problems that may occur from heavy use of the device, particularly by young people and nonsmokers. Complications from heavy nicotine ingestion via a Juul include increased risk of heart disease and stroke, changes in brain functionality that cause an increased susceptibility to anxiety and depression, heightened risk of cancer, and negative effects on fertility, according to the lawsuit.
The case says despite the defendants’ positioning of the non-FDA-approved Juul as a smoking cessation device or smoking alternative, the defendants have, among other tactics, used viral marketing, social media, third-party influencers, positive image reinforcement, appealing food and flavor imagery and language, and free giveaways to turn the vaporizer into a status symbol among youth.
“This campaign extends and expands upon deceptive advertising tropes used by tobacco companies to exploit the psychological needs of consumers—especially youth—to convert them into smokers,” the suit reads.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.