Jumio Facing Class Action Over Alleged Collection of Instacart Shoppers’ Facial Scans
Rosas v. Jumio, Inc.
Filed: March 19, 2024 ◆§ 3:24-cv-01716
A proposed class action alleges Jumio, Inc. illegally collects, stores and disseminates the facial geometry scans of Instacart shoppers in Illinois.
A proposed class action alleges Jumio, Inc. illegally collects, stores and disseminates the facial geometry scans of Instacart shoppers in Illinois.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
According to the 15-page privacy lawsuit, Instacart requires shoppers to upload a photo of themselves and their driver’s license before they can begin to deliver groceries for the app. The complaint explains that Instacart has defendant Jumio perform a “facial geometry analysis” of these pictures to verify shoppers’ identities, both during initial account setup and at “regular intervals” while they’re working.
However, Jumio, in violation of the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA), fails to inform residents and obtain consent prior to collecting, storing and sharing their face templates—“highly detailed” geometric maps of the face, the case claims.
The lawsuit alleges that Jumio is one of “numerous” third parties that process personal information for Instacart, all of whom have had shoppers’ facial geometry scans “disclosed, redisclosed or otherwise disseminated to them” by Jumio, the suit adds.
Per the filing, the BIPA was enacted to ensure that Illinois consumers have control over their biometric information, which consists of “unique, permanent” identifiers that cannot be replaced if compromised. The suit contends that Jumio’s “unlawful” collection of shoppers’ biometrics exposes them to “serious and irreversible privacy risks.”
“For example, if Jumio’s database containing facial geometry scans or other sensitive, proprietary biometric data is hacked, breached, or otherwise exposed, Jumio users have no means by which to prevent identity theft, unauthorized tracking, or other unlawful or improper use of this highly personal and private information,” the complaint stresses.
The plaintiff, an Illinois resident, says that neither Instacart nor Jumio made any mention of biometric information when she worked for the grocery delivery service.
“Instead, Instacart simply instructed [the plaintiff] to upload her state issued identification form, avatar photograph, and periodic verification photos as part of the onboarding and day-to-day job duties while working as shopper for Instacart,” the case shares.
The suit also claims that Jumio has run afoul of the BIPA by failing to inform Instacart shoppers in writing of the specific purpose and length of time for which their biometric information would be collected, stored and used. The company was also required to publish a retention schedule detailing how long the workers’ data would be kept and when it would be permanently destroyed, the filing relays.
The lawsuit looks to represent any Illinois residents who, within the last five years, had their biometric information collected by Jumio while using Instacart.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.