Hematogenix Laboratory Services Hit with Privacy Class Action Over Employee Fingerprint Scans
by Erin Shaak
Wazwaz v. Hematogenix Laboratory Services, LLC
Filed: March 24, 2021 ◆§ 1:21-cv-01608
A lawsuit alleges Hematogenix scanned workers’ fingerprints for timekeeping purposes without first securing consent to do so or making mandatory disclosures.
Illinois
A proposed class action alleges Hematogenix Laboratory Services, LLC has scanned workers’ fingerprints for timekeeping purposes without first securing express consent to do so or making mandatory disclosures.
According to the 19-page lawsuit, the Tinley Park, Illinois testing laboratory has overstepped the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting workers’ biometric information, i.e., fingerprints, without securing their consent or providing required disclosures with regard its collection practices and retention policy.
Per the case, biometrics are unlike ID badges or timecards in that they are unique, permanent identifiers that cannot be changed or replaced if compromised. The suit claims the defendant’s alleged collection and use of employees’ fingerprints without adhering to the BIPA has exposed workers to “serious and irreversible privacy risks.”
More specifically, the case claims Hematogenix has violated the BIPA by failing to:
- Inform workers in writing of the specific purpose and length of time for which their biometric information will be collected, stored, disseminated and used;
- Provide a publicly available retention schedule and guidelines for how the data will be permanently destroyed; and
- Receive a written release from employees to collect, store, disseminate or otherwise use their fingerprints.
The plaintiff, who worked as a flow technologist at the defendant’s lab between March 2017 and February 2021, says he was required to clock in and out of Hematogenix’s timekeeping system by scanning his finger. According to the suit, the plaintiff was never provided with proper disclosures regarding the collection and use of his biometric data and never signed a written release consenting to such. The plaintiff and others, the lawsuit argues, have been “continuously and repeatedly” exposed to “risks and harmful conditions” as a result of the defendant’s conduct.
“BIPA protects employees like Plaintiff and the putative Class from this precise conduct, and Defendant had no right to secure this data,” the complaint alleges.
The lawsuit looks to represent anyone who was enrolled in the defendant’s biometric timekeeping system and used a biometric timeclock while employed by the company in Illinois during the applicable statutory period.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.